KMID : 0360220150560111720
|
|
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2015 Volume.56 No. 11 p.1720 ~ p.1727
|
|
Comparison of Biometric Measurements and Refractive Results between Applanation Ultrasonography and Three Different Interferometries
|
|
¹®Áö¼±:Moon Ji-Sun
½ÅÁ¤¾Æ:Shin Jeong-Ah/¹èÁöÇö:Bae Gi-Hyun/Á¤¼º±Ù:Chung Sung-Kun
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: To compare ocular biometry and refractive results measured using conventional applanation ultrasonography and 3 different optical interferometries, Lenstar LS900¨Þ, AL-Scan¨Þ and OA-2000¨Þ.
Methods: The biometries of 31 cataractous eyes were measured using ultrasonography, Lenstar LS900¨Þ, AL-Scan¨Þ or OA-2000¨Þ. The axial length, anterior chamber depth and keratometry were measured. The SRK/T formula was used to calculate intraocular lens power. Two months after cataract surgery, the refractive outcome was determined and results from the 4 different biometry methods were compared.
Results: Axial lengths were 23.39 ¡¾ 0.95 mm, 23.42 ¡¾ 0.98 mm, 23.43 ¡¾ 0.98 mm and 23.44 ¡¾ 0.98 mm measured using ultrasonography, Lenstar LS900¨Þ, AL-Scan¨Þ and OA-2000¨Þ, respectively with no statistically significant differences observed (p = 0.996). The anterior chamber depth and keratometry were 3.14 ¡¾ 0.41 mm, 3.10 ¡¾ 0.38 mm and 3.13 ¡¾ 0.39 mm (p = 0.936) and 44.41 ¡¾ 1.52 D, 44.54 ¡¾ 1.57 D and 44.44 ¡¾ 1.52 D (p = 0.937) for Lenstar LS900¨Þ, AL-Scan¨Þ and OA-2000¨Þ respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 optical devices. The mean absolute error of the 4 different devices were not statistically significant (p = 0.722).
Conclusions: The ocular biometric measurements and prediction of postoperative refraction using ultrasonography, Lenstar LS900¨Þ, AL-Scan¨Þ or OA-2000¨Þ showed no significant differences.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Axial length, OA-2000¨Þ, Optical low coherence reflectometry, Partial coherence interferometer, Refractive error
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|